Musk's xAI Loses Second Co-founder in Two Days
xAI faces brain drain as key founders exit amid deepfake scandal and regulatory probes. What does this exodus mean for Musk's AI ambitions?
Two days. Two departures. And a $1.25 trillion question about what's really happening inside Elon Musk's AI empire.
Jimmy Ba, the University of Toronto professor whose research helped power xAI's Grok 4 models, announced his exit Tuesday on X. "Grateful to have helped co-found at the start," he wrote—a diplomatic farewell that came just 24 hours after fellow co-founder Tony Wu made his own departure public.
The Unraveling Dream Team
When Musk launched xAI in 2023, he assembled what many called a "dream team" of 11 co-founders. The mission? Nothing less than understanding "the true nature of the universe."
Now, nearly half are gone. Igor Babuschkin, Kyle Kosic, and Christian Szegedy have already departed. Greg Yang stepped back last month to battle Lyme disease. The exodus leaves Musk's AI venture looking more like a revolving door than a research powerhouse.
Ba's departure stings particularly. His work on neural networks directly influenced Grok's capabilities, making him one of the technical architects behind xAI's flagship product.
Scandal and Scrutiny
The timing isn't coincidental. xAI faces regulatory probes across Europe, Asia, and the U.S. after its Grok AI enabled mass production of non-consensual explicit images—deepfake porn using real people's photos, including children.
For a company that promised to unlock cosmic truths, getting mired in deepfake scandals represents a spectacular mission drift. Regulators aren't amused, and the investigations are just beginning.
The SpaceX Factor
This month's all-stock merger with SpaceX valued the combined entity at over a trillion dollars, with SpaceX taking the lion's share at $1 trillion and xAI at $250 billion. The deal positions SpaceX for its planned IPO this year, but it also transforms xAI from scrappy startup to corporate subsidiary.
For researchers who joined to revolutionize AI, becoming part of an aerospace conglomerate might not align with their original vision. The corporate structure that comes with trillion-dollar valuations can feel constraining to academics used to research freedom.
The bigger question: In an AI arms race where talent is the ultimate currency, can any company—even one backed by Musk's empire—afford to lose its founding scientists?
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
RingCentral and Five9 surge 34% and 14% respectively, showing AI can boost rather than kill software businesses. A blueprint for survival in the AI era.
Specialized AI security system detected vulnerabilities in 92% of real-world DeFi exploits worth $96.8M, while hackers increasingly use AI to automate attacks at just $1.22 per attempt.
An AI coding bot took down a major Amazon service, exposing the hidden risks of automated development. What this means for the future of AI-powered coding.
India positions itself as the world's AI 'use-case capital' with massive investment pledges, but the gap between pilot projects and mass deployment reveals deeper challenges ahead.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation