Liabooks Home|PRISM News
James Austin Johnson on the SNL stage
ViralAI Analysis

Why James Austin Johnson's Best David Fricke Impression is Too Obscure for SNL

2 min readSource

SNL star James Austin Johnson opens up about why his 'best' impression of Rolling Stone's David Fricke is constantly rejected for being too obscure for the show.

The master of impressions can't get his best bit on air. Even for a talent like James Austin Johnson, the man who perfectly captures Donald Trump, there's one character that remains strictly off-limits: David Fricke.

The Resounding No: James Austin Johnson SNL David Fricke Rejections

During a panel at the Television Academy on June 2, 2025, Johnson revealed that his impression of the legendary Rolling Stone editor is a "resounding no" every time he brings it to the SNL writers' table. Despite his colleagues' amusement, the consensus remains that Fricke isn't famous enough for the average viewer.

The conversation was sparked when SNL alum Fred Armisen recalled his own struggle to get an Ira Glass impression past dress rehearsals. Johnson chimed in, noting that writers often ask him, "Why are we doing this?" when he launches into Fricke's voice. "It's the most boring voice you've ever heard in your life," Johnson joked before demonstrating his pitch-perfect take on the music journalist.

  • Johnson has attempted the bit numerous times during table reads over the past 8 years.
  • Co-stars like Ego Nwodim and Bowen Yang confirmed they find the bit hilarious, yet it never survives the cutting floor.
  • The rejection highlights the gatekeeping of 'mass appeal' in late-night comedy.

Waiting for the Return of SNL Season 51

With SNL currently on winter hiatus, fans are looking forward to new episodes in January 2026. Whether Johnson will finally manage to sneak his niche masterpiece into a sketch remains to be seen, but for now, it remains a legendary 'lost' bit among the cast.

This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.

Related Articles