FCC Prison Cell Phone Jamming Controversy 2026: Security vs. Public Safety

Could silencing a criminal's phone also kill your 911 call? A high-stakes clash is erupting at the FCC as a new proposal aims to give state and local prisons the green light to jam contraband cell phones. While law enforcement sees a vital security tool, wireless carriers see a dangerous threat to public infrastructure.

The FCC Prison Cell Phone Jamming Proposal 2026 Debate

The proposal, championed by FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, has garnered significant support from Republican attorneys general and prison phone companies. Proponents argue that contraband phones are a primary engine for organized crime within prison walls, necessitating aggressive electronic countermeasures.

However, the wireless industry is firing back. On December 29, 2025, the CTIA—representing major carriers—submitted a scathing response. They argue that jamming is a blunt instrument that doesn't just target contraband; it blocks every signal in its path, potentially crippling 911 emergency services for the general public.

Major Carriers and Legal Hurdles

Industry giants AT&T and Verizon didn't hold back in their individual comments. AT&T described the proposed legal framework as being based on a "flawed factual premise." The CTIA went a step further, asserting that the FCC simply doesn't have the legal authority to authorize jamming that disrupts lawful communications.

The concerns extend beyond just cellular voice and data. Groups focused on Wi-Fi and GPS technologies have warned that prison jamming could interfere with critical navigation and local networking services, creating a ripple effect of technological disruption in surrounding communities.