UN Experts Condemn US Naval Blockade of Venezuela as 'Illegal Armed Aggression'
Four UN human rights experts have condemned the US naval blockade of Venezuela as 'illegal armed aggression,' citing over 100 deaths and violations of international law.
Is it a counter-narcotics operation or an illegal act of war? Four United Nations human rights experts have offered a stark assessment, condemning the United States' partial naval blockade of Venezuela as an act of “illegal armed aggression.” The joint statement, released on Wednesday, December 24, follows a UN Security Council meeting on the US military actions.
'A Prohibited Use of Force'
The four experts, including Ben Saul, the special rapporteur on protecting human rights while countering “terrorism,” stated unequivocally that “there is no right to enforce unilateral sanctions through an armed blockade.” They argue the blockade is a prohibited use of military force under the UN Charter and is “expressly recognised as illegal armed aggression under the General Assembly’s 1974 Definition of Aggression.” The experts warned that these actions “gravely endanger the human right to life” in the region.
Washington vs. Caracas: Dueling Narratives
The US has deployed significant military forces in the Caribbean, intercepting oil tankers and other vessels. President Donald Trump accuses Venezuela of using its oil revenue to finance “narcoterrorism, human trafficking, murders and kidnappings.” In contrast, the government of Nicolas Maduro in Caracas denies any involvement in drug trafficking. It claims Washington's objective is to overthrow its government to seize the country's oil reserves, which are the largest in the world.
Over 100 Killed, Calls for US Congress to Act
Since September, US forces have launched dozens of air strikes on boats alleged to be transporting drugs, resulting in more than 100 deaths, according to AFP. The US has yet to provide evidence for these accusations. “These killings amount to violations of the right to life,” the UN experts said, demanding an investigation. They directly called on the “US Congress to intervene to prevent further attacks and lift the blockade.”
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
The US has attacked Iran, abducted Venezuela's president, and quit 66 international bodies. The question is no longer whether America is stepping back—it's whether anyone else will step up.
CCTV footage showing explosions near Tehran schools raises complex questions about civilian protection in modern conflicts. As videos spread globally, what does this mean for international law and public opinion?
Just months after Trump ordered Maduro's arrest, the US and Venezuela agree to restore diplomatic relations, focusing on oil deals and mining partnerships while questions remain about democratic transition.
Six days of US-Israeli strikes on Iran have damaged hospitals, schools, and UNESCO sites, sparking fierce debate over civilian protection and international law compliance.
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation