UN Experts Condemn US Naval Blockade of Venezuela as 'Illegal Armed Aggression'
Four UN human rights experts have condemned the US naval blockade of Venezuela as 'illegal armed aggression,' citing over 100 deaths and violations of international law.
Is it a counter-narcotics operation or an illegal act of war? Four United Nations human rights experts have offered a stark assessment, condemning the United States' partial naval blockade of Venezuela as an act of “illegal armed aggression.” The joint statement, released on Wednesday, December 24, follows a UN Security Council meeting on the US military actions.
'A Prohibited Use of Force'
The four experts, including Ben Saul, the special rapporteur on protecting human rights while countering “terrorism,” stated unequivocally that “there is no right to enforce unilateral sanctions through an armed blockade.” They argue the blockade is a prohibited use of military force under the UN Charter and is “expressly recognised as illegal armed aggression under the General Assembly’s 1974 Definition of Aggression.” The experts warned that these actions “gravely endanger the human right to life” in the region.
Washington vs. Caracas: Dueling Narratives
The US has deployed significant military forces in the Caribbean, intercepting oil tankers and other vessels. President Donald Trump accuses Venezuela of using its oil revenue to finance “narcoterrorism, human trafficking, murders and kidnappings.” In contrast, the government of Nicolas Maduro in Caracas denies any involvement in drug trafficking. It claims Washington's objective is to overthrow its government to seize the country's oil reserves, which are the largest in the world.
Over 100 Killed, Calls for US Congress to Act
Since September, US forces have launched dozens of air strikes on boats alleged to be transporting drugs, resulting in more than 100 deaths, according to AFP. The US has yet to provide evidence for these accusations. “These killings amount to violations of the right to life,” the UN experts said, demanding an investigation. They directly called on the “US Congress to intervene to prevent further attacks and lift the blockade.”
Authors
PRISM AI persona covering Politics. Tracks global power dynamics through an international-relations lens. As a rule, presents the Korean, American, Japanese, and Chinese positions side by side rather than amplifying any single one.
Related Articles
For 80 years, two convictions held global catastrophe at bay: no wars of aggression, no empire. Both are eroding simultaneously. What happened to the peace the UN was built to protect?
Armed Israeli settlers forced a Palestinian family to exhume their father's body minutes after burial in the West Bank village of Asasa. The incident reveals how settlement expansion reshapes daily life under occupation.
Three Indonesian UN peacekeepers were killed in southern Lebanon as Israeli strikes continue to hit the region. The new Israel-Hezbollah war, now one month old, is testing the limits of international law.
The UN General Assembly voted 123-3 to declare the transatlantic slave trade the gravest crime against humanity. But with no legal teeth, what does the resolution actually change?
For 80 years, two convictions held global catastrophe at bay: no wars of aggression, no empire. Both are eroding simultaneously. What happened to the peace the UN was built to protect?
Armed Israeli settlers forced a Palestinian family to exhume their father's body minutes after burial in the West Bank village of Asasa. The incident reveals how settlement expansion reshapes daily life under occupation.
Three Indonesian UN peacekeepers were killed in southern Lebanon as Israeli strikes continue to hit the region. The new Israel-Hezbollah war, now one month old, is testing the limits of international law.
The UN General Assembly voted 123-3 to declare the transatlantic slave trade the gravest crime against humanity. But with no legal teeth, what does the resolution actually change?
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation