America's Dual Citizenship Dilemma: Choose One or Lose Both
New GOP bill would force millions to choose between U.S. citizenship and their second passport within a year. What this means for America's global competitiveness and individual freedom.
31% of Americans support forcing naturalized citizens to choose just one passport. But what happens when the other 69% discover they might lose theirs too?
Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno's Exclusive Citizenship Act has landed like a diplomatic bombshell in Washington, proposing something unprecedented: forcing anyone with dual citizenship to pick a side within 12 months or automatically forfeit their American passport. The bill arrives as Donald Trump's second administration doubles down on immigration enforcement, but this time, it's not just targeting new arrivals—it's putting millions of existing Americans in an impossible position.
The Stakes: More Than Just Paperwork
The numbers tell a complex story. While the U.S. doesn't officially track dual citizens, Henley & Partners reported a 183% surge in Americans seeking second citizenship options in early 2025 compared to 2024. The timing isn't coincidental—it reflects growing anxiety about America's political trajectory and global standing.
Under current law, renouncing U.S. citizenship requires extensive documentation, multiple interviews, and a hefty $2,350 fee. But Moreno's proposal would flip this process entirely: stay silent for a year, and your American passport vanishes automatically. No appeals, no second chances.
The senator, who immigrated from Colombia as a child and voluntarily renounced his Colombian citizenship at 18, argues this "all or nothing" approach reflects true American commitment. Yet his personal story highlights the bill's fundamental contradiction—he had the luxury of choice that his legislation would eliminate for others.
The Global Citizenship Gold Rush
Miami immigration attorney Michelle Abeckjerr sees the urgency firsthand. "Everyone applying for U.S. citizenship already has at least one other nationality," she explains. "The main idea is to have choices—economically, politically, if you don't align with the United States, you have the option to move somewhere else."
This desire for optionality has created a modern gold rush for second passports. Countries like Ireland, Portugal, and Italy have seen unprecedented demand for citizenship-by-ancestry programs. Ireland maintains relatively stable requirements for those with Irish-born grandparents, while Italy recently tightened rules after being overwhelmed by applications, now limiting claims to those with Italian parents or grandparents.
For the wealthy, "golden visa" programs offer faster tracks to citizenship through investment. But as Jen Barnett from Expatsi notes, "Applying for dual citizenship is rare for Americans outside of citizenship by ancestry." Most Americans pursuing second passports aren't fleeing—they're hedging.
The Tax Trap Nobody Talks About
Here's where Moreno's bill reveals an unintended consequence that could backfire spectacularly. The U.S. is one of only two countries worldwide (alongside Eritrea) that taxes citizens regardless of where they live. American dual citizens abroad often maintain their U.S. passports specifically because renouncing them doesn't eliminate existing tax obligations and creates complex compliance issues.
Force them to choose, and many might simply renounce American citizenship entirely. "If Americans aren't allowed to have dual citizenship, many will renounce, and the U.S. will lose that tax income," Barnett predicts. The Treasury Department hasn't publicly estimated this potential revenue loss, but with millions of Americans living abroad, it could be substantial.
Constitutional Collision Course
Legal experts see a Supreme Court showdown brewing. The 1967 Afroyim v. Rusk decision established that Americans cannot lose citizenship unless they voluntarily surrender it under the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause. Moreno's automatic forfeiture provision appears to directly contradict this precedent.
The bill also raises questions about equal protection. Why should naturalized citizens face different rules than those born on American soil? Many dual citizens inherited their second nationality through birth or ancestry—circumstances beyond their control.
The Closing Window
As the political debate intensifies, practical options are narrowing. Italy's new restrictions signal a broader trend of countries limiting popular ancestry-based citizenship programs. Spain and Portugal have similarly tightened requirements after processing unprecedented application volumes.
Abeckjerr advises clients considering second passports to act quickly: "The moment is now." But this urgency itself reveals the bill's deeper flaw—it's pushing Americans toward the very behavior it claims to discourage.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation
Related Articles
Senate Agriculture Committee's crypto market structure bill faces uncertain future amid 'fundamental policy differences' between Republicans and Democrats, with snowstorms and government funding deadlines adding complexity.
The S&P 500 crossed 7,000 for the first time in history. But beneath this milestone lies a market story that's more complex than the headlines suggest.
New Nikkei poll shows Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party could regain lower house majority in Feb 8 snap election, rising from 198 to over 233 seats. Analysis of political implications and opposition challenges.
Major US corporations continue mass layoffs in 2026 under the banner of efficiency, raising questions about the true drivers behind workforce reductions and their long-term implications for the economy.
Thoughts