UN Secretary-General António Guterres US Critique 2026: Law of Power vs Power of Law
UN Secretary-General António Guterres warns that the US is prioritizing the 'law of power' over international law in a 2026 BBC interview. Read more on UN reform.
The world order is shaking. António Guterres, head of the United Nations, just delivered a stinging assessment of the United States' current foreign policy. Speaking to the BBC, he warned that some nations believe "the power of law should be replaced by the law of power."
UN Secretary-General António Guterres US Critique 2026: A World of Impunity
Guterres didn't hold back. He stated the US acts with a "clear conviction" that multilateral solutions are no longer relevant. Instead, Washington focuses on the raw exercise of power and influence, often sidelining the norms of international law. This critique arrives as Donald Trump continues to threaten the annexation of Greenland and following a US strike in Venezuela.
The UN chief expressed deep concern that the founding principles of the organization—especially the equality of member states—are under massive threat. President Trump has previously questioned the UN's purpose, claiming it didn't help in ending wars he managed to stop single-handedly.
The Security Council Deadlock and Reform
According to Guterres, the UN Security Council is increasingly "ineffective" and no longer represents the modern world. He criticized the veto power used by permanent members like Russia and the US to further individual interests rather than global peace, particularly in Ukraine and Gaza.
| Era | Approach | Key Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| 1945 | Institutional Multilateralism | Post-WWII Reconstruction |
| 2026 | Raw Power Dynamics | Impunity & Annexation Threats |
Guterres noted that while the UN is engaged in solving conflicts, it lacks leverage. In Gaza, the organization's inability to distribute aid was often due to Israel's blockage. He stressed that "1945 problem-solving" methods aren't enough to tackle 2026 problems.
This content is AI-generated based on source articles. While we strive for accuracy, errors may occur. We recommend verifying with the original source.
Related Articles
Ten days into the US-Israel war on Iran, over 2,000 targets struck and 1,255 dead — yet Washington's endgame remains unclear. We unpack the contradictions.
The US has attacked Iran, abducted Venezuela's president, and quit 66 international bodies. The question is no longer whether America is stepping back—it's whether anyone else will step up.
Four years into the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia's gamble for a multipolar world has produced something its architects didn't anticipate: a world reshaping itself around everyone but Russia.
Ten days into the US-Israel war with Iran, Trump is now claiming veto power over who leads the Islamic Republic. Is this about nukes, or something bigger?
Ten days into the US-Israel war on Iran, over 2,000 targets struck and 1,255 dead — yet Washington's endgame remains unclear. We unpack the contradictions.
The US has attacked Iran, abducted Venezuela's president, and quit 66 international bodies. The question is no longer whether America is stepping back—it's whether anyone else will step up.
Four years into the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia's gamble for a multipolar world has produced something its architects didn't anticipate: a world reshaping itself around everyone but Russia.
Ten days into the US-Israel war with Iran, Trump is now claiming veto power over who leads the Islamic Republic. Is this about nukes, or something bigger?
Thoughts
Share your thoughts on this article
Sign in to join the conversation