South Korean Ruling Party Pushes for Special Insurrection Tribunal, Opposition Launches Filibuster
On Dec. 22, 2025, South Korea's ruling Democratic Party introduced a bill for a special insurrection tribunal, prompting the opposition PPP to launch a filibuster in a major clash over judicial independence.
SEOUL, South Korea – South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party (DP) on Monday introduced a contentious bill to establish a special tribunal for insurrection cases, specifically targeting those linked to former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid. The move immediately triggered a filibuster from the main opposition People Power Party (PPP), escalating a high-stakes political showdown over judicial independence.
The DP has championed the tribunal, citing what it calls unacceptable delays and a lack of fairness in the ongoing trials of officials implicated in the martial law case. However, the proposal has drawn sharp criticism that it may be unconstitutional and could severely undermine the judiciary's authority.
In a direct challenge, the PPP launched a filibuster to block the bill's passage. PPP leader Rep. Jang Dong-heok took the floor, accusing the DP of a blatant power grab. "The ruling party is seeking to create court benches made up of judges it favors in an attempt to take control over the judiciary," he declared.
How a Filibuster Works in South Korea
A filibuster is a procedural tactic used to delay or block a vote on a bill by holding the floor for an extended period. Under the National Assembly Act, it can be forcibly ended after 24 hours if at least three-fifths of all parliament members (180 lawmakers) vote to do so.
The proposed bill calls for establishing at least two special benches each at the Seoul Central District Court and the Seoul High Court to handle cases of insurrection, treason, and rebellion. In a concession to critics, the final version of the bill stipulates that judges will be selected by a body under Supreme Court guidelines, not a recommendation committee as initially planned. The bill also dropped a controversial clause that would have restricted presidential pardons for those convicted of insurrection.
Importantly, ongoing trials, including that of former President Yoon on charges of leading an insurrection, would continue to be handled by their existing benches.
"The judiciary itself has voiced strong opposition. Last week, the Supreme Court announced it would independently install its own special panels for such cases, a move widely seen as an alternative to the DP’s legislative plan."
With a comfortable parliamentary majority, the DP plans to wait out the 24-hour filibuster period and then use its numbers to end the debate and pass the bill. The confrontation comes as Yoon and several former high-ranking officials, including former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, are currently on trial. The outcome of this legislative battle could have profound implications for the country's political and judicial landscape.
Related Articles
South Korea's ruling and opposition parties have agreed to launch a special counsel investigation into bribery allegations involving the Unification Church and politicians on both sides, signaling a rare moment of unity to tackle a growing political scandal.
South Korea's ruling Democratic Party has introduced a bill for a special insurrection tribunal targeting former President Yoon Suk Yeol, triggering a constitutional crisis with the judiciary and opposition.
Progressives are pushing Medicare for All in key Democratic Senate primaries, creating a rift with moderates who fear it undermines a united attack on Republicans over Obamacare. The debate signals a deeper battle for the party's future healthcare strategy.
Lee Jun-seok, a South Korean opposition leader, was questioned for nearly 10 hours on Dec. 21 by a special counsel over allegations of election meddling tied to former first lady Kim Keon Hee and former President Yoon Suk Yeol.